
I’m a firm believer that for any country to thrive (economically, socially, psychologically & spiritually) all forms of oppression and racist hatred towards any population segment has to go. I fully understand how such a belief works against the traditional structure of our capitalistic society wherein some population groups are continuously oppressed for a small percentage to continue to thrive, but who says we cannot thrive as a society based on a paradigm of true equality (not the currently existing pseudo form of equality), as this structural model has yet to be attempted?? I say the California ruling on gay marriage is one step in the right direction of equality for all. And if you disagree please don’t justify it by saying it’s because “your” God said so, as this is not truly God speaking, but this is your oppressive, mind-created, judgmental interpretation of how you believe God wants every person on the planet to live. Oh, and please also keep in mind that church and state are legally (supposed to remain) separate … yes our Prez Bush poorly demonstrates this constitutional law, but what else would we expect … for him to suddenly abide by domestic and international laws?!
California Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban
21 minutes ago
The California Supreme Court has overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California to become the second state where gay and lesbian residents can marry.
The case involved a series of lawsuits seeking to overturn a voter-approved law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
With the ruling, California could become the second state after Massachusetts where gay and lesbian residents can marry.
"What happens in California, either way, will have a huge impact around the nation. It will set the tone," said Geoffrey Kors, executive director of the gay rights group Equality California.
California already offers same-sex couples who register as domestic partners the same legal rights and responsibilities as married spouses, including the right to divorce and to sue for child support. It's therefore unclear what additional relief state lawmakers could offer short of marriage if the court renders the existing ban unconstitutional.
A coalition of religious and social conservative groups is attempting to put a measure on the November ballot that would enshrine California's current laws banning gay marriage in the state constitution.
The Secretary of State is expected to rule by the end of June whether the sponsors gathered enough signature to qualify the marriage amendment, similar to ones enacted in 26 other states.
The cases before the California court were brought by the city of San Francisco, two dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and another gay rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San Francisco's monthlong same-sex wedding march that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's direction.
The cases before the California court were brought by the city of San Francisco, two dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and another gay rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San Francisco's monthlong same-sex wedding march that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's direction.
Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
Copyright © 2008 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.